This research study gives the actual value of PI (?), a mathematical constant that describes the relationship between a circular structure\'s circumference and diameter. It also highlights the lacuna in the most commonly used approximations of PI (?), such as 3.14159…, which were supplied by Archimedes. It also rejecting all the values of PI calculated by various mathematicians in almost 4000 years of mathematical history, and presents the absolute 100% true value of PI through various mathematical process and conclusions.
Introduction
Conclusion
The calculation of PI has presented in this research paper with the actual percent value, so where a certain ratio in the sequence of numbers is ?10 = 3. 16227766... and in addition to this, in this research paper It is clear from geometrical and numerical experiments that ?10 = 3. 16227766... is the true value of PI and actual value of radian is ?3240 = 56.9209979…
Apart from this, the relation of circumference and radius of a circular structure has also been described in the form of R = C×?0.025, through which the actual value of the second factor can be obtained for the given radius or circumference. This real value of PI is reflected in more effective applications in the fields of physics, mathematics, and space science.
References
[1] Lokesh Dewangan, L-Sign Theorem for Repeating Non-Terminating Problem in Division, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES) ISSN (Online): 2320-9364, ISSN (Print): 2320-9356
[2] Lokesh Dewangan, Solution of Repeating Non-Terminating Problem in Division , International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98.
[3] A., Volkov Calculation of ? in ancient China : from Liu Hui to Zu Chongzhi, Historia Sci. (2) 4 (2) (1994), 139-157
[4] Ahmad, A., On the ? of Aryabhatta I, Ganita Bharati 3 (3-4) (1981), 83-85.
[5] Archimedes. \"Measurement of a Circle.\" From Pi: A Source Book.
[6] Beckman, Petr. The History of Pi. The Golem Press. Boulder, Colorado, 1971.
[7] Berggren, Lennart, and Jonathon and Peter Borwein. Pi: A Source Book. Springer-Verlag. New York, 1997.
[8] Bruins, E. M., with roots towards Aryabhatt’s ?- value, Ganita Bharati 5 (1-4) (1983), 1-7.
[9] C Pereira da Silva, A brief history of the number ? (Portuguese), Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (2) 7 (1) (1986), 1-8.
[10] Cajori, Florian. A History of Mathematics. MacMillan and Co. London, 1926
[11] Cohen, G. L. and A G Shannon, John Ward\'s method for the calculation of pi, Historia Mathematica 8 (2) (1981), 133-144
[12] K Nakamura, On the sprout and setback of the concept of mathematical \"proof\" in the Edo period in Japan : regarding the method of calculating number ?, Historia Sci. (2) 3 (3) (1994), 185-199
[13] L Badger, Lazzarini\'s lucky approximation of ?, Math. Mag. 67 (2) (1994), 83-91.
[14] M D Stern, A remarkable approximation to ?, Math. Gaz. 69 (449) (1985), 218-219.
[15] N T Gridgeman, Geometric probability and the number ?, Scripta Math. 25 (1960), 183-195.
[16] Florian Cajori, A History of Mathematics, second edition, p.143, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1919.
[17] Greenberg, Marvin Jay (2008), Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries (Fourth ed.), W H Freeman, pp. 520–528, ISBN 0-7167-9948-0
[18] Heath, Thomas (1981). History of Greek Mathematics. Courier Dover Publications.
[19] Hobson, E. W., Squaring the circle (London, 1953).
[20] O\'Connor, John J. and Robertson, Edmund F. (2000).
[21] P Beckmann, A history of ? (Boulder, Colo., 1971).
[22] P E Trier, Pi revisited, Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 25 (3-4) (1989), 74-77.
[23] P Freguglia, The determination of ? in Fibonacci\'s \'Practica geometriae\' in a fifteenth century manuscript (Italian), Contributions to the history of mathematics (Italian) (Modena, 1990), 75-84.
[24] I Tweddle, John Machin and Robert Simson on inverse-tangent series for ?, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 42 (1) (1991), 1-14.
[25] Jami, C., Une histoire chinoise du \'nombre ?\', Archive for History of Exact Sciences 38 (1) (1988), 39-50.